Pewter,
You're entirely right to be concerned about peoples health and the welfare of your friends.
I disagree with your viewpoints on chemicals, as well as the numbers you cited on allergies. The problem with informal surveys is that they are informal and not conducted based on any real qualitative or quantitative standards. Based on what I'm seeing thus far, I'm seeing that the numbers are an emotional or knee jerk reaction to a philosophy rather than fact.
The reason I posted this is because I just found out that my friend who I've known since I was young (way back before the atom was split LOL) went in for an allergy test. As long has I've know him he's swore up and down that he is allergic to sulfites. Well guess what, he went in for an allergy test and he's not allergic to sulfites, cat hair, rag weed, pollen, yup, but not sulfites.
I've just undergone an allergy test myself. I was stung as a young child by a bee, my foot swelled up really bad, and in to the doctor I went. I was told I was allergic to bees. Guess what, not allergic to bees. I've been carrying a bee sting kit with me for years that I didn't need. I did find out that I have a mild reaction to cat spit, but other than that a clean bill of health.
Just as the old "don't swim" for an hour after you eat has been debunked, there are a number of other generally accepted maxims that are being disproven as well. I suspect if everyone who claims to be allergic to one thing or another went in for an allergy test, they would find fewer numbers than the claims.
Bottom line is there are plenty of things that can be improved with the application of research and technology. I firmly believe that mead is one of them.
Guess we just have to agree to disagree.
Cheers,
Oskaar