You're absolutely right. We shouldn't twist the word "mazer" into a new meaning. Rather, we should create a whole new word for our purposes. From scratch, as it were. With no history. I therefor propose the following completely new as of this moment word for indicating a mead maker: mazer.
I know some of you will object to its obvious similarity to extant vocabulary, though those of you who are in this category will have clearly missed the intent, as well as the intended etymology. This word shares a root with "amaze", because our production can be 'mazing. Any similarities with other vocabulary is no more than inescapable syncretism (extended to roots, but then why should inflectional forms be special?).
I know some of you will object to its obvious similarity to extant vocabulary, though those of you who are in this category will have clearly missed the intent, as well as the intended etymology. This word shares a root with "amaze", because our production can be 'mazing. Any similarities with other vocabulary is no more than inescapable syncretism (extended to roots, but then why should inflectional forms be special?).