Chaucer was the first commercial mead I tried upon landing in the USA.
To my taste (and my wife's) it was ghastly. Apologies to those that love it, but to my taste buds, it had was complex and noisy, no clear notes for me, other than the one that gives you a "whiskey face" due to the enormity of its sweetness. We tried leaving it a day or so in the assumption that our tastebuds were having an off day, and quickly realised our tastebuds were just fine. This mead is single handedly responsible for the incentive to make my own. Maybe I was just spoiled by good (subjectively speaking) mead in the UK.
I'd expect a decent amount of people tasting this as their first experience of "mead", would go away saying things like "I don't like mead" (which I've heard numerous times since letting people know I'd make my own); in the same way that most of the wine consumers don't spend their time drinking dessert wine, and dessert wine represents less than perhaps 5% of all commercial wines available, likewise, drinks like Chaucer represent just a small part of the mead world but tend to tar all mead with the same taste brush
It doesn't help the mead public image in my very subjective opinion, when wine can be categorised by it's different varietals, and regions and styles (burgundy, malbec, chardonnay, etc), where as the commercial mead is usually categorised as nothing more than honey-wine, or "mead" with little else to help the consumer understand that there is more than just "syrupy mead". (Obviously this is just as relevant to people that taste very dry mead and dislike it)
Sorry... will get off of my soapbox now. But isn't there a better way in the industry of making categorisation and labelling far more clear like it is in the win world, even if that's to prominently indicate sweet/medium-sweet/medium-dry/dry/brut etc?
To my taste (and my wife's) it was ghastly. Apologies to those that love it, but to my taste buds, it had was complex and noisy, no clear notes for me, other than the one that gives you a "whiskey face" due to the enormity of its sweetness. We tried leaving it a day or so in the assumption that our tastebuds were having an off day, and quickly realised our tastebuds were just fine. This mead is single handedly responsible for the incentive to make my own. Maybe I was just spoiled by good (subjectively speaking) mead in the UK.
I'd expect a decent amount of people tasting this as their first experience of "mead", would go away saying things like "I don't like mead" (which I've heard numerous times since letting people know I'd make my own); in the same way that most of the wine consumers don't spend their time drinking dessert wine, and dessert wine represents less than perhaps 5% of all commercial wines available, likewise, drinks like Chaucer represent just a small part of the mead world but tend to tar all mead with the same taste brush
It doesn't help the mead public image in my very subjective opinion, when wine can be categorised by it's different varietals, and regions and styles (burgundy, malbec, chardonnay, etc), where as the commercial mead is usually categorised as nothing more than honey-wine, or "mead" with little else to help the consumer understand that there is more than just "syrupy mead". (Obviously this is just as relevant to people that taste very dry mead and dislike it)
Sorry... will get off of my soapbox now. But isn't there a better way in the industry of making categorisation and labelling far more clear like it is in the win world, even if that's to prominently indicate sweet/medium-sweet/medium-dry/dry/brut etc?